God’s grace, peace and mercy be with you. My sermon is entitled Paul’s
Song, Letter and World. My focus is our Epistle (1st Corinthians
12:31b-13:13). Let us pray. Heavenly Father, the psalmist wrote, “I
rejoiced when they said to me, ‘Let us go to the house of the Lord.’” Now
that our feet are within your gates, we rejoice to hear your Word. As we
listen, may your Spirit enlighten our minds and move our hearts to love deeply
as Jesus loved. This we pray to you, Most Holy Trinity. Amen.
“Puff the magic dragon
lived by the sea and frolicked in the autumn mist in a land called Honali.” I open with
these words for two reasons. First, when Cindy and I celebrated five years of
marriage, we travelled to Hawaii, and one of the sites we visited was Hanalei
on the north shore of the island of Kauai. Fewer than 500 people live in
Hanalei, a village smaller than one square mile. Hanalei is often associated
with the song popularized by Peter, Paul and Mary.
Second, one member of
the trio who sang Puff the Magic Dragon also wrote a song we
requested for our wedding. Paul Stookey wrote Wedding Song in
1969 and performed it at the wedding of Peter Yarrow, the other male singer of
the trio.
Shortly after his
Christian conversion, Yarrow asked Stookey to “bless our wedding with a
song.” According to Stookey, “the melody and the words arrived
simultaneously and in response to a direct prayer asking God how the divine
could be present at Peter’s wedding.” Drawing almost verbatim from
Matthew 18:20, the original lyric is “I am now to be among you at the
calling of your hearts; rest assured this troubadour is acting on My part. The
union of your spirits here has caused Me to remain for whenever two or more of
you are gathered in My name, There am I...There is Love.”
Concerned that the
wedding guests might misinterpret his intention, Stookey changed “I” to “He”
until 1990 when he ‘officially’ restored the original lyric.
The first two lines of
the second verse, “A man shall leave his mother and a woman leave her
home. And they shall travel on to where the two shall be as one,” paraphrased
Genesis 2:24: "Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother
and be joined to his wife, and they shall become one flesh."
Believing he could not
take personal credit for composing "The Wedding Song",
Stookey set up the Public Domain Foundation, which since 1971 received the
song's royalties for charitable distribution. … If you have time this week,
listen to Paul’s song. You will enjoy it.
Couples request many
songs and readings for their weddings. Paul’s Letter to the Corinthians is one
of the most popular. As a pastor preparing to write a sermon for their wedding,
I ask couples why they choose their readings. Often, they reply, “Because
we like them.” If couples knew the background of Paul’s Letter, they
might choose another passage.
Corinth’s Christians
were a mix of Jews and Gentiles from various economic strata. That the rich
were shameless and the poor were wretched led to ethical and liturgical
problems.
Although not the
founding pastor of their church, Paul made several trips to Corinth. In
essence, he fathered the community and took great interest in its well-being.
The experience of Paul’s second trip, however, left him heart-broken.
Sexual immorality,
legal disputes, Eucharistic abuses and controversies about the resurrection of
the dead were some of the problems Paul encountered. Yet, the real problem was two-fold:
Gnosticism and behavior. The Gnostics were people who thought that they were
wiser than everyone. The others thought they could do whatever they wanted.
Chapter 13 concerned
itself with behavior that caused serious dissension within the community. While
the people causing this dissension were spirit-people or charismatics, Paul
addressed the entire church. Paul based his ecclesiology, his teaching of
Church, on his Christology, his teaching of Christ. To be Church, Christians
were to imitate Christ in their relations with one another. They could not see
themselves as wiser nor could they do whatever they wanted.
In chapter 13, Paul
pointed out how the Corinthian Christians did not reflect Christ’s love. In
verses 4-8, Paul listed what love is and is not. It is not about personal
preference. C.S. Lewis said that to love and to like are not the same. I can
like some people more than others, but I am to love all people.
To illustrate that
love, Paul used the term agape, one of three Greek words for love. Eros is
passionate love that desires the other for itself. Philos is
love of the gods or good friends. Agape has neither the magic
of eros nor the warmth of philos, but is an
unmotivated, active love.
Paul understood the
differences among the three types of love. After all, he grew up as a typical
Hellenistic Jewish student, and as a Christian, understood Jesus’ teaching of
love of God, neighbor and enemy. We find all of this in chapter 13, but rather
than define love, Paul personified it. He chose verbs that involved another
person in order to highlight the virtues that the Corinthians neglected. They
were not patient and kind. Some insisted on their own way. The community
rejoiced at wrongdoing.
Citing himself as an
example, Paul spelled out the characteristics of love in such a way that the
Corinthians could recognize it for what it was – the foundation of the Church.
In a community where jealousy and rivalry ruled their hearts, hearing that love
is not jealous, pompous, inflated, rude, self-seeking, quick-tempered,
calculating or joyful in lawlessness or wrongdoing was imperative.
For Paul, love was not
a gift from God like other virtues. Love was not a legal command to be
fulfilled. The love of which Paul wrote was beyond compare because it was the
Spirit of God at work in the Church. As he wrote in chapter one, the
Corinthians lacked no skills, but skills without love matter not in a faith
community awaiting salvation from their Lord.
At the time Paul
visited Corinth, there were about 50 Christians. Gathering 50 adults into one
house church would have been difficult, awkward and uncommon. More likely,
families, servants and a few friends met in smaller groups fostering an
intimate family atmosphere that tended to promote divisions within the wider
community.
When these smaller
groups came together, divisions were played out. The host group sat in the
innermost rooms, while the visitors gathered on the porch. The host group
gathered for an early meal, while hungry visitors arrived later. Such
liturgical abuses fostered resentment among church members.
While the love of the
Trinity should have bonded and energized the Body of Christ, the Church, family
ties and friendships tore it apart. That said, why do couples choose Paul’s
Letter? That leads me from Paul’s Letter to Paul’s world.
By Paul’s world, I
mean, my world, your world. Your world and mine share a common denominator.
Each is populated by people. A vast array of people we know and love, know and
do not love, and do not know or love populates our worlds. The population is so
vast that we cannot consider everyone in a short sermon or a lengthy
dissertation; however, we can draw a sampling. Allow me to relate one group of
people to our reading: friends and family.
Starry-eyed lovers
preparing for marriage relate well to Paul’s song and Paul’s letter as their
wedding day approaches. Newlyweds love one another, as they should. The world
of newlyweds often consists of one other person – the person they love. In love
with one another, they – like we – learn that love for one another may not
last, may not suffice. For that reason, couples and families must also love the
Other (with a capital O).
The Other – God – gets
along perfectly well without us. Can we get along without God? Some argue that
we can. They say we can get along without God when our needs are met. They have
money and all that it can buy. They have a strong body and healthy mind. They
are independent and self-reliant, and have someone to love, and family and
friends.
However, what happens when
friends get busy or distracted? When family members move away, get sick or die?
What happens when loved ones contract cancer or Alzheimer’s? When they lose
their job or health? Can they get along without God at those moments?
Personally speaking, when my dad died suddenly and when my mom contracted
cancer, suffered for a year and then died, I needed God more than ever during
those moments for my world suffered from the faults of sin and death.
Personally, I am still
learning more than I ever have about the importance of Paul’s Letter as it
relates to how I view and treat people. Paul’s song is about children who
outgrow their imaginary friends. Paul’s Letter is about adults who have yet to
grow into Christian maturity and their relationships with one another as
Church. Paul’s world is about how we – beloved children of God – personify
Christ in terms of First Corinthians 13.
In my relationships
with the people I love, am I patient and kind, benevolent and modest, humble
and polite, calm and joyful? Do family and friends see Christ in me? Do people
see in me someone childish or mature? Do they see a person of faith, hope and
love?
Friends, no simple
ditty or wedding song will transform us into mature, thoughtful, loving
Christian men and women. But as we ponder the meaning of God’s Word and the
importance of God’s Sacrament, may we put away childish ways and see in a
mirror who God has called us to be. May God’s Word and Sacrament embodied in us
transform us into His sons and daughters who see and treat one another as
Christ’s brothers and sisters. As we do, may the peace of God that surpasses
all understanding, keep our hearts and minds in Christ Jesus. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment